Some Questions We Know to Ask
- Identify sample questions to be asked on the largest scales.
- Identify sample questions to be asked on the intermediate scale.
- Identify sample questions to be asked on the smallest scales.
Throughout the text we have noted how essential it is to be curious and to ask
questions in order to first understand what is known, and then to go a little
farther. Some questions may go unanswered for centuries; others may not have
answers, but some bear delicious fruit. Part of discovery is knowing which
questions to ask. You have to know something before you can even phrase a decent
question. As you may have noticed, the mere act of asking a question can give
you the answer. The following questions are a sample of those physicists now
know to ask and are representative of the forefronts of physics. Although these
questions are important, they will be replaced by others if answers are found to
them. The fun continues.
On the Largest Scale
- Is the universe open or closed? Theorists would like it to be just barely
closed and evidence is building toward that conclusion. Recent measurements
in the expansion rate of the universe and in CMBR support a flat universe.
There is a connection to small-scale physics in the type and number of
particles that may contribute to closing the universe.
- What is dark matter? It is definitely there, but we really do not know what
it is. Conventional possibilities are being ruled out, but one of them still
may explain it. The answer could reveal whole new realms of physics and the
disturbing possibility that most of what is out there is unknown to us, a
completely different form of matter.
- How do galaxies form? They exist since very early in the evolution of the
universe and it remains difficult to understand how they evolved so quickly.
The recent finer measurements of fluctuations in the CMBR may yet allow us to
explain galaxy formation.
- What is the nature of various-mass black holes? Only recently have we
become confident that many black hole candidates cannot be explained by
other, less exotic possibilities. But we still do not know much about how
they form, what their role in the history of galactic evolution has been, and
the nature of space in their vicinity. However, so many black holes are now
known that correlations between black hole mass and galactic nuclei
characteristics are being studied.
- What is the mechanism for the energy output of quasars? These distant and
extraordinarily energetic objects now seem to be early stages of galactic
evolution with a supermassive black-hole-devouring material. Connections are
now being made with galaxies having energetic cores, and there is evidence
consistent with less consuming, supermassive black holes at the center of
older galaxies. New instruments are allowing us to see deeper into our own
galaxy for evidence of our own massive black hole.
- Where do the \(\gamma\) bursts come from? We see bursts of \(\gamma\)
rays coming from all directions in space, indicating the sources are very
distant objects rather than something associated with our own galaxy. Some
\(\gamma\)
bursts finally are being correlated with known sources so that the
possibility they may originate in binary neutron star interactions or black
holes eating a companion neutron star can be explored.
- How do phase transitions take place on the microscopic scale? We know a lot
about phase transitions, such as water freezing, but the details of how they
occur molecule by molecule are not well understood. Similar questions about
specific heat a century ago led to early quantum mechanics. It is also an
example of a complex adaptive system that may yield insights into other
self-organizing systems.
- Is there a way to deal with nonlinear phenomena that reveals underlying
connections? Nonlinear phenomena lack a direct or linear proportionality
that makes analysis and understanding a little easier. There are implications
for nonlinear optics and broader topics such as chaos.
- How do high- \({T}_{\text{c}}\)
superconductors become resistanceless at such high temperatures?
Understanding how they work may help make them more practical or may result
in surprises as unexpected as the discovery of superconductivity itself.
- There are magnetic effects in materials we do not understand—how do they
work? Although beyond the scope of this text, there is a great deal to learn
in condensed matter physics (the physics of solids and liquids). We may find
surprises analogous to lasing, the quantum Hall effect, and the quantization
of magnetic flux. Complexity may play a role here, too.
On the Smallest Scale
- Are quarks and leptons fundamental, or do they have a substructure? The
higher energy accelerators that are just completed or being constructed may
supply some answers, but there will also be input from cosmology and other
systematics.
- Why do leptons have integral charge while quarks have fractional charge? If
both are fundamental and analogous as thought, this question deserves an
answer. It is obviously related to the previous question.
- Why are there three families of quarks and leptons? First, does this imply
some relationship? Second, why three and only three families?
- Are all forces truly equal (unified) under certain circumstances? They
don’t have to be equal just because we want them to be. The answer may have
to be indirectly obtained because of the extreme energy at which we think
they are unified.
- Are there other fundamental forces? There was a flurry of activity with
claims of a fifth and even a sixth force a few years ago. Interest has
subsided, since those forces have not been detected consistently. Moreover,
the proposed forces have strengths similar to gravity, making them
extraordinarily difficult to detect in the presence of stronger forces. But
the question remains; and if there are no other forces, we need to ask why
only four and why these four.
- Is the proton stable? We have discussed this in some detail, but the
question is related to fundamental aspects of the unification of forces. We
may never know from experiment that the proton is stable, only that it is
very long lived.
- Are there magnetic monopoles? Many particle theories call for very massive
individual north- and south-pole particles—magnetic monopoles. If they exist,
why are they so different in mass and elusiveness from electric charges, and
if they do not exist, why not?
- Do neutrinos have mass? Definitive evidence has emerged for neutrinos
having mass. The implications are significant, as discussed in this chapter.
There are effects on the closure of the universe and on the patterns in
particle physics.
- What are the systematic characteristics of high- \(Z\) nuclei? All elements with \(Z=118\)
or less (with the exception of 115 and 117) have now been discovered. It has
long been conjectured that there may be an island of relative stability near
\(Z=114\) , and the study of the most recently discovered nuclei will
contribute to our understanding of nuclear forces.
These lists of questions are not meant to be complete or consistently
important—you can no doubt add to it yourself. There are also important
questions in topics not broached in this text, such as certain particle
symmetries, that are of current interest to physicists. Hopefully, the point is
clear that no matter how much we learn, there always seems to be more to know.
Although we are fortunate to have the hard-won wisdom of those who preceded us,
we can look forward to new enlightenment, undoubtedly sprinkled with surprise.
Section Summary
- On the largest scale, the questions which can be asked may be about dark
matter, dark energy, black holes, quasars, and other aspects of the universe.
- On the intermediate scale, we can query about gravity, phase transitions,
nonlinear phenomena, high- \({T}_{c}\) superconductors, and magnetic effects
on materials.
- On the smallest scale, questions may be about quarks and leptons, fundamental
forces, stability of protons, and existence of monopoles.
Conceptual Questions
For experimental evidence, particularly of previously unobserved phenomena, to be taken seriously it must be reproducible or of sufficiently high quality that a single observation is meaningful. Supernova 1987A is not reproducible. How do we know observations of it were valid? The fifth force is not broadly accepted. Is this due to lack of reproducibility or poor-quality experiments (or both)? Discuss why forefront experiments are more subject to observational problems than those involving established phenomena.
Discuss whether you think there are limits to what humans can understand about the laws of physics. Support your arguments.